Now that the Journal of Asia TEFL is indexed in SCOPUS, we will continue to seek indexing in other places and further academic recognition. Critical to this is raising the number of citations, a measure commonly used to approximate academic excellence. We should expect to find citations to articles we have published in papers submitted for consideration; this will show connectivity and contribute to building collegiality in our publication. We have also appealed to our regional representatives to nominate more scholars, whether resident in Asia or not, who will share in the review process by serving on the editorial board. It is the editors who guarantee the real quality of the journal, and we welcome offers to serve from senior scholars or suggestions of whom to invite.
Readers might notice that my comments in this editorial raise questions about specific articles. This is part of a growing concern for quality, and suggests that authors might be a little more worried stating conclusions. I mention one bugbear: the interpretation of non-significant results as still favoring one side. In fact, even statistically significant results are often only weak evidence. We need to keep clear the difference between evidence and opinion.
This issue presents another group of fine papers, selected by the editorial team from a large number of offerings. They are as usual well spread in region, and show signs of collaboration across national boundaries. A good number, it will be noted, deal with the nature and teaching of vocabulary, a topic popular in the 1920s and then relatively ignored until quite recently.
Angkana Tongpoon-Patanasorn (Khon Kaen University, Thailand) deals with a key problem in curriculum revision, namely how to train or persuade teachers to adapt innovation. Many years ago, in the heyday of the NDEA in the USA, it was found that intensive summer courses changed teacher¡¯s vocabulary but not behavior. In this paper it is found that a change to ¡°learner-centeredness¡± in the Thai curriculum has still not been understood or implemented by teachers many years after it was adopted; clearly, a great deal of training is needed, or perhaps better still, curricular changes need to be carried out with full teacher participation.
Although there is a common perception that tutorials and seminars are a better way of teaching at the university level, economic considerations and tradition alike agree in setting lectures as the general mode. A team of teachers from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia (Radha M.K Nambiar, Saran Kaur Gill, Noraini Ibrahim and Tan Kim Hua) reports on a study of how Malaysian university students respond to various styles of lecturing. They favor organized presentations, with some unthreatening calls for student interaction.
The reinvigorated study of vocabulary has been associated also with a growing concern for the relevance to language learning of collocations, words that are frequently juxtaposed to each other. In an ambitious and carefully designed study, Ali Roohani (Shahrecord University, Iran) sets out to compare the frequency of collocations in locally produced and British EFL textbooks and to try to trace the influence of any difference. Not surprisingly, the Cambridge series, composed under the direction of the well-known applied linguist Jack Richards has more frequent collocations, but the difference does not reach statistical significance. The study found also that students in private schools using the Cambridge texts did a little better on collocational tests.
A popular solution to the shortage of qualified English teachers produced locally in Asia is to hire native speakers from abroad. The topic is controversial and deserves continued study. Christian Youngwan Shin (from South Korea which has a government policy of inviting English teachers from overseas) explores one interesting aspect of the phenomenon, the problems a group of such teachers had in teaching large classes of engineering students. Some solutions are suggested.
Language teachers, though aiming to produce bilinguals, have long been told to keep the language classroom pure by using and allowing only the target language. This belief, a legacy of the Direct Method fashionable at the end of the 19th century, is perhaps more honored in the breach than the observance, and obviously ignored in many foreign language classrooms in Asia where the main language is the national language (I was shocked at a classroom where every English sentence spoken by the otherwise fluent teacher and her highly proficient advanced students was immediately translated into the pupil¡¯s language).
While little empirical evidence has been produced to support Robert Gardner¡¯s theory of multiple intelligences, and the theory is generally discounted among psychologists, it has been taken up as is not uncommon by educators who hope that it may assist with the challenging task of teaching. Zia Tajeddin (Allameh Tabataba¡¯I University) and Nazila Chiniforoushan (Islamic Azad University) ask whether students¡¯ self-reported scores on tests claimed to measure visual intelligence correlate with scores on vocabulary tests. The lack of significant results agrees with the general distrust of the theory, but they still report that their low proficiency students like vocabulary teaching that included pictures.
Idioms are another aspect of vocabulary that presents problems to the language learner and teacher. Zorana Vasiljevic (Bunkyo University, Japan) has carried out a small but suggestive pilot study on whether grouping idioms conceptually, following the semantic theory of Lakoff and Johnson, will assist. Doing this and discussing the arrangement in the students¡¯ language, turned out to be helpful.
What are the components of problems of listening comprehension, and can awareness of these problems help overcome them? Zhenghou Zhang of the School of Foreign Languages, Weifang Medical University and Lawrence Jun Zhang of the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore have developed and tested a self-report scale of listening comprehension problems that they hope might help.
In another study of vocabulary, Yongyan Zheng (Fudan University, Shanghai, China) has designed and tried out a test of deep knowledge of English vocabulary that also assesses the influence of native speaker¡¯s Chinese.
In a study that connects the provision of translation (or rather glosses of various types) with vocabulary learning, Jonghua Liu of Zhuhai Radio and TV University, China finds no immediate differences in effect among monolingual, bilingual, and multiple choice glosses, but the multilingual exercises do have a long term effect.
Rounding out the issue, a paper by John Trent (Department of English, Institute of Education, Hong Kong) reports on a study of eight Mainland Chinese students who have come to Hong Kong for a teacher education program. It analyzes the language learner identity process in these students, showing common as well as varying tendencies. It contributes thus to the growing research on language study abroad programs.
Jerusalem, Summer 2011 Bernard Spolsky, Editor-in-chief and Asia TEFL Publications Executive Director
Angel M. Y. Lin (Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong) Anne Burns (Macquarie University, Australia) Asruddin Tou (Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia) David Nunan (Anaheim University, Hong Kong) Farhat Khan (Aligarh Muslim University, India) Fatma Alwan (UAE Ministry of Education, UAE) Hemamala Vajira Madawala Ratwatte (Open University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka) Hyacinth Gaudart (University of Malaya, Malaysia) Jun Liu (University of Arizona, USA) Kensaku Yoshida (Sophia University, Japan) Qiufang Wen (Beijing Foreign Studies University, China) Oryang Kwon (Seoul National University, Korea) Leo VanLier (Monterey Institute of International Studies, Thailand) Lubna Alsagoff (Nanyang Techological University, Singapore) Marlu Vilches (Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines) Mehdi Riazi (Shiraz University, Iran) Michael McCarthy (University of Nottingham, UK) Mick Randall (British University in Dubai, UAE) Mike Levy (Griffith University, Australia) Nasreen Mujahida Ahsan (Aga Khan University, Pakistan) Neil Anderson (Brigham Young University, USA) Richard Baldauf (The University of Queensland, Austrailia) Roger Barnard (University of Waikato, New Zealand) Ronald Carter (University of Nottingham, UK) Saran Kaur Gill (University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia) Shahid Siddiqui (Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan) Stephen Andrews (Hong Kong University, Hong Kong) Thomas Farrell (Brock University, Canada) William Littlewood (Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong) Won-Key Lee (Seoul National University of Education, Korea) Yasuo Nakatni (Japan, Tokyo University of Science, Japan) Yuko Butler (University of Pennsylvania, USA)
Editorial Board (Editors)
Arifa Rahman (University of Dhaka, Bangladesh) Cheung Yin Ling (National Institute of Education, Singapore) Christine Coombe (Dubai Men's College, UAE) Chul Joo Uhm (Chonnam Univ., Korea) Dongwan Cho (Pohang University of Science and Technology, Korea) Elinor Saiegh Haddad (Bar Ilan University, Israel) Fuad Abdul Hamied (Indonesia University of Education, Indonesia) Galina Lovtsevich (Far Eastern National University, Russia) Gholam Reza Kiany (Tarbiat Modarress University, Iran) He Lianzhen (Zhejiang University, China) Heyoung Kim (Chung Ang University, Korea) Irina Kovalenko (Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University) Kazem Lotfipour-Saedi (Akita International University, Japan) Leslie Barratt (Indiana State University, USA) Normala Othman (International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia) Mardziah Hayati Abdullah (Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia) Marianne Perfecto (Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines) Mei Lin Caroline Ho (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore) Mohammad Ali Salmani Nodoushan (Iran Encyclopedia Compiling Foundation, Iran) Nobuo Okada (Osaka University, Japan) Olga Sichyova (Amur State University, Russia) Pragasit Sitthitikul (Walailak University, Thailand) Punchalee Wasanasomsithi (Chulalongkorn University, Thailand) Roger Barnard (Waikato University, New Zealand) RS Gupta (Jawaharlal Nehru University, India) Samina Qadir (Fatima Jinnah University, Pakistan) Shyam Iyengar (Govt. M. L. Shukla College, India) Sook-OK Kweon (POSTECH, Korea) Soyoung Lee (Inha Univ., Korea) Sung-Mook Choi (Kyungpook National University, Korea) Toshihiko Suzuki (Waseda University, Japan) Yonglin Yang (Tsinghua University, China) Young-Sook Shim (Catholic Univ. Of Korea, Korea) Yusun Kang (Korea University, Korea) Zoya Profshina (Far Eastern University, Russia)
Editorial Board (Readers)
Abbas Zare-ee (University of Kashan, Iran) Abdoreza Tahriri (University of Guilan, Iran) An E He (Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong) Arna Peretz (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel) Awad Ahmed (An-Najah National University, Palestine) Bee Hoon Tan (Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia) Chayanika Hazarika (The English and Foreign Languages University, India) Deron Walker (California Baptist University, USA) Dil Afroze Quader (Dhaka University, Bangladesh) Duqin Wang (Beijing Institute of Petro-chemical Technology, China) Ed Nicholson (Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China) Esmat Babaii (University for Teacher Education, Iran) Eunice Tang (The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong) Faizah A Majid (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia) Francis Xavier (Universiti Teknologi MARA Kedah, Malaysia) Hasan Ansary (Islamic Azad University, Iran) Helena Agustien (SEAMEO-RELC, Singapore) Honggang Liu (Peking University, China) Hongjun Fu (Xinjiang University, China) Hua Chen (Nanjing University, China) Huw Jarvis (University of Salford, UK) Ju Zhan (Jilin University, China) Junju Wang (Shandong University, China) Justin Shewell (United Arab Emirates University, UAE) Kamisah Ariffin (University Teknologi MARA, Malaysia) Kishwar Khan (Haraganga college, Bangladesh) Li Li (Queen's University, Belfast, UK) Lixin Xiao (Tianjin Polytechnic University, P. R. China) Marie J. Guilloteaux (Gyeongsang National University, Korea) Masdinah Alauyah Md. Yusof (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia) Md. Maniruzzaman (Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh) Meihua Liu (Tsinghua University, China) Mohammed Jasim Betti (University of Thi-Qar, Iraq) N.D.R. Chandra (Nagaland University, India) Nasrin Shokrpour (Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran) Natalia Prosh'yants (Far Eastern National University, Russia) Nematullah Shomoossi (Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Iran) Phuc Cao Nguyen (Khanh Hoa Department of Education and Training, Vietnam) Rieko Matsuoka (National College of Nursing, Japan) Saovapa Wichadee (Bangkok University, Thailand) Sayeedur Rahman (University of Dhaka, Bangladesh) SungSoo Jang (Inje University, Korea) Svetlana Suchkova (Samara State Aerospace University, Russia) Tae-Young Kim (Chung-Ang University, Korea) Tan Bee Tin (The University of Auckland, New Zealand) Thu Dinh Nguyen (HochiMinh City University of Technical Education, Vietnam) Tomohito Ishikawa (Soka Women's College, Japan) Trudy Zuckermann (Hebrew University, Israel; Achva Academic College of Education, Israel) Tzu-chia Chao (Ming Hsin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan) Wataru Suzuki (University of Toronto, Canada) Xuesong Gao (Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong SAR, China) Yan Yan Zhang (Wuhan University, China) Younghwa Lee (Sun Moon University, Korea) Zhichang Xu (The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong)